Skip to content

WebSockets vs gRPC: Client-Facing vs Microservice Communication

Quick Summary

gRPC and WebSockets target different layers of real-time communication: gRPC excels at efficient service-to-service communication with its RPC model and Protocol Buffers, while WebSockets provide flexible client-facing real-time features for web and mobile applications. They serve complementary roles in modern architectures.

At a Glance Comparison

FeatureWebSocketsgRPC
Primary UseClient-facing real-timeService-to-service RPC
ProtocolWebSocket over HTTP/1.1HTTP/2 based
Data FormatFlexible (JSON, binary)Protocol Buffers
Browser Supportβœ… Native⚠️ gRPC-Web proxy needed
StreamingBidirectionalMultiple modes (unary, streaming)
Type Safety❌ Runtime validationβœ… Compile-time types
Code Generation❌ Manualβœ… Automatic from proto
Connection ModelPersistentRequest-based or streaming
AuthenticationVarious (cookies, tokens)mTLS, tokens
Multiplexing❌ Single streamβœ… Multiple streams
ComplexityMediumHigh

How gRPC Works

gRPC is a high-performance RPC framework that uses HTTP/2 and Protocol Buffers for efficient service communication.

Protocol Definition

chat.proto
syntax = "proto3";
service ChatService {
// Unary RPC
rpc SendMessage(Message) returns (MessageResponse);
// Server streaming
rpc SubscribeToMessages(SubscribeRequest) returns (stream Message);
// Bidirectional streaming
rpc Chat(stream Message) returns (stream Message);
}
message Message {
string id = 1;
string user_id = 2;
string content = 3;
int64 timestamp = 4;
}
message MessageResponse {
bool success = 1;
string message_id = 2;
}
message SubscribeRequest {
string user_id = 1;
}

Server Implementation (Node.js)

const grpc = require('@grpc/grpc-js');
const protoLoader = require('@grpc/proto-loader');
// Load proto file
const packageDefinition = protoLoader.loadSync('chat.proto');
const chatProto = grpc.loadPackageDefinition(packageDefinition).ChatService;
// Implement service methods
const chatService = {
// Unary RPC
sendMessage: (call, callback) => {
const message = call.request;
console.log('Received:', message);
callback(null, {
success: true,
message_id: generateId()
});
},
// Server streaming
subscribeToMessages: (call) => {
const userId = call.request.user_id;
// Send messages periodically
const interval = setInterval(() => {
call.write({
id: generateId(),
user_id: 'system',
content: 'Server update',
timestamp: Date.now()
});
}, 1000);
call.on('cancelled', () => {
clearInterval(interval);
});
},
// Bidirectional streaming
chat: (call) => {
call.on('data', (message) => {
console.log('Received:', message);
// Echo back
call.write({
id: generateId(),
user_id: 'server',
content: `Echo: ${message.content}`,
timestamp: Date.now()
});
});
call.on('end', () => {
call.end();
});
}
};
// Start server
const server = new grpc.Server();
server.addService(chatProto.service, chatService);
server.bindAsync('0.0.0.0:50051',
grpc.ServerCredentials.createInsecure(),
() => {
console.log('gRPC server running on port 50051');
server.start();
}
);

How WebSockets Work

WebSockets provide persistent, bidirectional connections between clients and servers, ideal for real-time web applications.

WebSocket Implementation

// Server
const WebSocket = require('ws');
const wss = new WebSocket.Server({ port: 8080 });
wss.on('connection', (ws) => {
console.log('Client connected');
ws.on('message', (data) => {
const message = JSON.parse(data);
console.log('Received:', message);
// Broadcast to all clients
wss.clients.forEach(client => {
if (client.readyState === WebSocket.OPEN) {
client.send(JSON.stringify({
id: generateId(),
user_id: 'server',
content: `Echo: ${message.content}`,
timestamp: Date.now()
}));
}
});
});
ws.on('close', () => {
console.log('Client disconnected');
});
});
// Client (Browser)
const ws = new WebSocket('ws://localhost:8080');
ws.onopen = () => {
console.log('Connected to server');
ws.send(JSON.stringify({
user_id: 'client1',
content: 'Hello server!',
timestamp: Date.now()
}));
};
ws.onmessage = (event) => {
const message = JSON.parse(event.data);
console.log('Received:', message);
};
ws.onerror = (error) => {
console.error('WebSocket error:', error);
};
ws.onclose = () => {
console.log('Disconnected from server');
};

Key Differences

1. Target Audience

gRPC: Designed for backend microservices

  • Service-to-service communication
  • Internal APIs
  • Microservice architectures
  • Backend systems integration

WebSockets: Built for client applications

  • Browser-based real-time features
  • Mobile app connections
  • IoT device communication
  • User-facing real-time updates

2. Protocol Efficiency

gRPC: Highly optimized with Protocol Buffers

  • Binary serialization
  • Smaller message size
  • Schema enforcement
  • Type safety

WebSockets: Flexible but less efficient

  • Text or binary frames
  • JSON commonly used
  • No built-in schema
  • Runtime validation needed

3. Browser Support

gRPC: Limited browser support

  • Requires gRPC-Web proxy
  • Converts to HTTP/1.1
  • Additional infrastructure needed
  • Not native to browsers

WebSockets: Native browser support

  • Direct browser API
  • No proxy required
  • Works everywhere
  • Simple client implementation

4. Streaming Capabilities

gRPC: Four streaming modes

  • Unary (request-response)
  • Server streaming
  • Client streaming
  • Bidirectional streaming

WebSockets: Single bidirectional stream

  • Always bidirectional
  • No structured RPC patterns
  • Manual request-response correlation
  • Simpler mental model

Use Case Analysis

When to Use gRPC

βœ… Perfect for:

  • Microservice communication
  • Internal service APIs
  • High-throughput systems
  • Type-safe requirements
  • Polyglot environments
  • CPU-constrained services

Example scenarios:

  • Service mesh communication
  • Backend data pipelines
  • Internal API gateways
  • Distributed system coordination
  • High-frequency trading systems

When to Use WebSockets

βœ… Perfect for:

  • Real-time web applications
  • Browser-based features
  • Chat and messaging
  • Live notifications
  • Collaborative editing
  • Gaming and interactive apps

Example scenarios:

  • Chat applications
  • Live sports scores
  • Stock tickers
  • Collaborative documents
  • Online gaming
  • IoT dashboards

The Hybrid Approach

Many systems use both:

Browser/Mobile App <--WebSocket--> API Gateway <--gRPC--> Microservices

This architecture leverages:

  • WebSockets for client connections
  • gRPC for backend efficiency
  • API Gateway for protocol translation
  • Best tool for each layer

Implementation Complexity

gRPC Complexity

Setup Requirements:

  1. Proto file definitions
  2. Code generation setup
  3. Build tool integration
  4. Service discovery
  5. Load balancing configuration

Operational Challenges:

  • Debugging binary protocols
  • Browser proxy setup
  • Version management
  • Breaking changes handling

WebSocket Complexity

Setup Requirements:

  1. Connection management
  2. Reconnection logic
  3. Message framing
  4. Error handling
  5. Scaling considerations

Operational Challenges:

  • Connection state management
  • Horizontal scaling
  • Message ordering
  • Fallback mechanisms

Browser Compatibility

gRPC-Web Limitations

  • Unary and server streaming only
  • No client streaming
  • No bidirectional streaming
  • Requires proxy translation
  • Limited browser features

WebSocket Browser Support

  • 99%+ browser coverage
  • Native API support
  • Full bidirectional streaming
  • No proxy required
  • Standard web feature

Conclusion

gRPC and WebSockets serve different purposes in modern architectures. gRPC excels at efficient backend service communication with its RPC model and Protocol Buffers, while WebSockets provide the flexibility and browser support needed for client-facing real-time features.

Key Takeaways:

  1. Use gRPC for microservice communication and internal APIs
  2. Use WebSockets for browser and mobile real-time features
  3. Consider both in a hybrid architecture
  4. gRPC-Web exists but has limitations
  5. Protocol choice depends on your specific layer needs

While raw WebSocket or gRPC implementation requires significant effort, production applications often benefit from using established libraries or services that handle protocol complexities, connection management, and scaling challenges. For WebSockets specifically, libraries like Socket.IO or commercial services provide robust protocols on top of WebSockets with features like automatic reconnection, message queueing, and horizontal scaling support.

Further Reading


Written by Matthew O’Riordan, Co-founder & CEO of Ably, with experience building real-time systems reaching 2 billion+ devices monthly.